Why We Need Metadesign
- If designers are so resourceful and versatile, why do we still face climate change, biodiversity losses, poverty, etc.?
- Unfortunately, most are employed as specialists whose practices evolved within systems that need re-design.
- In the 19th century, designers transformed our industrial societies by making technology more appealing.
- However, by the 20th century design had become a handy catalyst for profit at the expense of Nature.
- Since the 1970s, while money markets grew exponentially, the natural environment suffered terrible depletions:
- These crises reflect a collective failure by many professions and agencies.
- Indeed, the above problems reflect the economic context, rather than by specific design failures.
- Nonetheless, making design leaner and cleaner was not enough to reform the whole system.
- If designers are hired as specialists, they have little opportunity to challenge the business models of a client.
- This may help to explain how they unwittingly helped to create the wasteful paradigm of consumption.
- For designers, making reforms will include challenging many habits and assumptions, including their own.
- To paraphrase Einstein: you can't change a paradigm using the same thinking that produced it.
- The vagueness of the term metadesign may be useful in encouraging new thinking everywhere.
What Can Metadesign Do?
- Metadesign is a collaboratively managed and mutually-supportive framework for enhancing life on Earth.
- It aims to re-align ideas, assumptions, beliefs, feelings and actions to inspire helpful social activism.
- Ultimately, it means (re-)designing for paradigm change, not just for new products, sales and services.
- First, this means integrating existing design specialisms within a comprehensive superset of tools and practices.
- However, paradigm change requires a qualitatively different approach that challenges familiar practices.
- Metadesign has adopted a systemic and relational approach in order to orchestrate feedback systems.
- This is inspired by our interest in ecosystems, as we see them as biological, self-sustaining paradigms.
- Hence, one might rethink genres of fashion, shopping, or architecture as 'clothing', 'food' and 'shelter'.
- We would then re-position 'clothing', 'food' and 'shelter' inside a more joined-up, synergistic framework.
- Here, 'synergism' is analogous to symbiosis in the sense that both are characterised by auspicious relations.
- Synergy is especially important in teamwork, where the tiniest negative synergy can trigger failure for all.
- Unfortunately, most synergies are ineffable, unpredictable, unmeasurable and hard to attribute or distribute.
- Metadesigners must, therefore, sense and re-language positive synergies to make them 'thinkable'.
- We applied group psychology methods to harness gut feelings at somatic and interpersonal levels.
- We developed flat-structured team-building methods to help individuals forget their individual agency.
- These methods cultivate co-creativity in order to synergise the collective knowledge within teams.
- We would use our mathematical and topological tools to cope with the cognitive complexities.
Design is Powerful
1947 Electric Car
Design is not intrinsically useless or bad. Indeed, a succession of visionaries, including William Morris, Buckminster Fuller and Amory Lovins have all seen the importance of 'design thinking' in addressing environmental problems, such as pollution, biodiversity losses, climate change and resource depletion. Designers use methods that are very different from those of as scientists or politicians, but they have changed the world. Indeed, the early design industry was spectacularly successful in making industrial power appealing to the general public. By creating new forms of beauty in electric lamps, telephones, railway trains, automobiles and fashion garments it built the foundations for what we some call 'lifestyle design'.
Design is Phoney
However, what brought 'sweetness and light' to the 19th century emerged in the 20th century as a handy tool for making profits, often at the expense of the natural world. By making the habits of acquisition and consumption so desirable and addictive, product designers unwittingly contributed to the major problems facing the 21st century. As Viktor Papanek famously observed: "There are professions more harmful than industrial design, but only a very few of them. And possibly only one profession is phonier. Advertising design, in persuading people to buy things they do not need, with money they do not have, in order to impress others who do not care, is probably the phoniest field in existence today.” (Papanek, 1971). To be fair, many designers have worked hard to create leaner or more durable modes of design. Unfortunately, their attempts to make design greener failed to keep pace with the relentless determination of globalised capital. Since the 1970s, while global markets grew exponentially, we lost 50% of the world's oil reserves, 30% of its forests, 25% of its topsoil, 50% of its phosphorous and 52% of its living creatures.
Can We Re-design Humanity?
So far, I am claiming that designers are as much a part of the problem as they are to its solution. Of course, humanity's destructive behaviour did not begin after 1969. Indeed, despite our apparent sophistication as 21st century beings, many of our behavioural habits pre-date human history (c.f. Calvin, ). They also helped to shape some of our cognitive patterns, beliefs and assumptions. For example, routine de-forestation, monocultural farming systems and the wholesale extraction of raw materials from the ground led to a widespread faith in the division of labour, mass production and standardisation. These methods led to an industrial revolution in which a technical culture of innovation encouraged a widespread search for one-off, mechanical gadgets and inventions. These factors, coupled with unit-based monetary systems did not quell the human inability to understand large numbers, quantities and qualities. Indeed, it may have led to an economic belief system that over-values quantities. We need to devise a new framework of language and understanding that enables humans to perceive, value and orchestrate synergies.
Reforming The Environment
We live in the era of 'makeovers' and human cloning, so it is tempting to consider re-designing ourselves. This could prove counterproductive, if not fatal. Buckminster Fuller wisely warned that it would be better to 'reform the environment'. By 'adequately organizing' it we might "permit humanity's original, innate capabilities to become successful" (Fuller, 1973). Presumably, these 'innate capabilities' include the seemingly indomitable desire to fashion objects and to trade them. Some of us who have explored the idea of metadesign believe that we can harness these tendencies in a re-design of design itself. While this hypothesis assumes a number of distinct steps, most have already been achieved. Archaeological and brain sciences suggest that Homo Erectus was dextrously and cognitively attuned to making tools nearly two million years ago. It is also likely that we these skills became the 'meta-skills' that enable us to draw, and to re-imagine, ever more powerful objects in the future. In its most fundamental form, metadesign requires one further step. Instead of thinking of design merely as an anticipatory process of planning new products or services, metadesigners would also apply similar thinking processes to the collective and self-reflexive re-design of the framework within which the design process takes place. In some respects this is nothing new. Company directors, accountants and managers already do this when working alongside designers and technicians to co-create a new range of products.
The Problem is Manifold
- Economic factors (Jackson, 2009)
- Over-population (Ehrlich & Ehrlich, 2013)
- The destructive effects of technology (Giddens, 2002).
However, we believe that designers need a more joined-up and systemic response that breaks away from our 'silo' mentality. Some business plans have performance indicators that are so limited that they seem lazy. For example, one of the causes of heart disease, obesity, diabetes is the popularity of fast-foods. But they use high levels of sugar, salt or meat because it is a cheap and easy way to make it palatable without employing well-paid chefs. However, whereas designers are usually asked to focus a few factors to make it desirable to a specific target consumer group, metadesigners would seek to join up many more factors in a way that is comprehensive enough to delivers many synergies to many more recipients and stakeholders.
Harmonising design with management has also been achieved, to a limited extent. Some theorists have claimed that design and management are equivalent practices, pragmatically speaking (Simon, 1969; Bauman, 206), because they both set out to achieve a desired goal, albeit using quite different methods. However, this does not mean that their roles and capabilities are directly interchangeable without re-training. The professional differentiation between managers and designers has, until now, ensured that the latter is often given a seemingly subservient role that precludes her from strategic decision-making. However, now that corporations have become more aware of the distinct skills of designers (e.g. 'design thinking'), this makes it conceivable that traditional managerial planning might give way to a more design-led approach in which community-oriented processes of co-envisioning and co-designing lead to a more circular, ecocentric economy.
- Aitkenhead, D., (2008), 'Enjoy life while you can’, (interview with James Lovelock), The Guardian, Saturday March 1, 2008
- Arsenault, J. & Brinkley, T., (1995), Toward an Indexical Criticism, Post-modern Culture - Volume 5, Number The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3rd May 1995
- Arthur, B., (1996), Increasing Returns and the New World of Business. Brian Arthur, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1996
- Barbrook, R., (2005), The High-Tech Gift Economy, First Monday Peer-reviewed online journal - http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_12/barbrook/ (December, 2005 - downloaded January 2007)
- Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam Books.
- Bauman, Z., 2006. Design, Ethics and Humanism. Cumulus Conference, Warsaw. Nantes, France 5 - 17 June 2006
- Benyus, J. (1997), Innovation Inspired by Nature: Biomimicry, William Morrow & Co.: New York.
- Brown, P., (2011), Guardian articles, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/sep/30/uk-cod-collapse-overfishing? accessed 30 September 2011.
- Brown, T., (2009) ‘Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society: How Design Thinking Can Transform Organizations and Inspire Innovation, Harper Collins, NY
- Brundtland, E., (1987), ‘Our Common Future’, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, available at: http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm (accessed 18th March 2012)
- Corning, P., (1983), The Synergism Hypothesis, Institute for the Study of Complex Systems, Palo Alto
- Cox, G., & Dayan, Z., (2005), Cox Review of Creativity in Business: building on the UK’s strengths, TSO: Norwich, Chapter 1.
- Cross, N., (1990), Designerly Ways of Knowing, Design Studies, 3 (4): 1982, pp. 221-227
- Cross, N., (2010), Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer-Verlag: London.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M., Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, New York: Harper and Row, 1990
- http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LawofTrulyLargeNumbers.html downloaded July 2009) (1989)
- Diaconis, P. and Mosteller, F., (2007), ‘Methods of Studying Coincidences', Journal of American Statistical Association, p. 84, 853-861 (cited in Weisstein, Eric W., Law of Truly Large Numbers From MathWorld – A Wolfram Web Resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LawofTrulyLargeNumbers.html downloaded August 2007)
- Dilnot, Clive. "The Critical in Design (Part One)." Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 1.2 (2008): 177-189.
- Dunne, A., (2005), Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2005
- Easterlin, R. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence’, in Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramowitz, edited by P.A. David and M.W. Reder, Academic Press: New York and London.
- Elton, L., (2008), Complexity, Universities and the Arts, Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, Intellect Books, Vol. 1, Issue 2, (this issue)
- Fairclough, K, (2005), ed. Jones, H. ‘Ecozen’, In Agents of Change: A Decade of MA Design Futures, Goldsmiths College: London, page 42.
- Forty, A., (1986),