Keyword - Auspicious

Return to glossary

Today it carries the sense of something propicious, favourable, well-disposed, or kind.
Where our rather scientific, rational train of thinking tends to separate the random from the causal, this word unifies them.
Designers may like to reflect on the role of 'luck' in the successful management of complex situations.

Design thinking works differently from managerial, bureaucratic or legislative methods.
Bureaucracy leans heavily on rules and regulations (see Aristotle's logic of categories).
This formalistic approach tends to justify itself via internal logic, rather than external outcomes.
See Greg Craven's analysis of truth-based assumptions in climate change discourse
Design is more outcome-centred and pragmatic than 'truth-oriented' and critical.
It changes the world by creating, and improving the affordances of things.
Thinking via affordances can produce a more consensual, outcome-oriented type of reasoning.

Adam Smith's Invisible Hand theory exemplifies an outcome-oriented mode of reasoning.
However, it seeks to enhance the global by focusing (selfishly) on the local.
This makes it inauspicious because it lacks symbiotic, or altruistic qualities.
An altruistic mode of design would therefore seem more auspicious.
Altruism is often depicted as being diametrically opposite to (individual) selfishness.
But it could, alternatively, be seen as a way to protect the (collective) self.
At the social level, altruism is usually characterised as an ethical/political issue.
At the ecological level it makes our humanistic, anthropocentric tendencies seem parochial.