Keyword - Agent
Return to glossary
A Useful Term?
In developing our (rather basic) concept of network consciousness we needed a term that might be used for both animate, and inanimate, things. The term 'agent' is suitable for this task. James Lovelock's theory of Gaia (Lovelock, 1979, p.x; Margulis, 1998, p. 5), identifies our planet as a vast, symbiotic, self-maintaining system, in which there is no useful distinction made between ‘living’ and ‘inanimate’ agents.
Game of billiards - showing Martin Horn
Is Agency Ever Singular?
Western thought sometimes implies that the cause of a particular event is a single agent. This impression may be an afterglow from classical science (e.g. Galilean & Newtonian dynamics), in which actions and reactions were simplified into tidy, axiomatic demonstrations of cause and effect. The tendency to attribute agency to one person or cause is also present in some post-Enlightenment thinkers (e.g. Hume, Nietszche & Schopenhauer) who became fascinated by the role (i.e. 'agency') of individuals, rather than by collective actions, in affecting change. This inspired the Romantic myth that great works are attributable to a 'lone genius'. (see article on ecomimicry). Today, the notion of co-agency begins to erode this conventional distinction and independence between, or among, agents. Everyday experience can also be deceptive, where we may not notice, or be only partly conscious of, processes that are key agents of change (e.g. tacit, implicit, or inter-personal forms of knowing - see article on hidden knowledge).
See Wikipedia for a fuller description.
See also jeong | holarchy | pre-purpose | sympoiesis | Co-Agency
Return to glossary